Blogs

India’s higher education system, home to globally recognized institutions like the IITs, NITs, IISc, and central universities, has long been admired for its rigorous standards and academic excellence. However, recent admission trends driven largely by CUET and JoSAA counselling mechanisms have sparked growing concern over declining merit thresholds.

For example, in the ongoing JoSAA seats allocation, candidates with all-India ranks (AIR) as high as 13,14,967 (male) and 12,10,797 (female) have secured seats in NIT Mizoram under the open category and home state quota in programs like Mechanical Engineering and Mathematics & Computing. Simultaneously, the first-round cut-offs for several Delhi University postgraduate programs including Arabic, Buddhist Studies, and Chemistry have fallen to zero or even negative marks.

Such trends indicate a notable dilution of the traditional meritocratic entry framework. While the drive to improve access and inclusivity is commendable, lowering cut-offs to this extent raises serious questions about academic standards, campus competitiveness, and institutional reputation.

In this article, the writer will explore:

• The scale and scope of these alarming shifts
• Underlying causes from reservation policies to system scaling
• Immediate and long-term implications for researchers, educators, and national innovation
• Policy and institutional reforms needed to strike an effective balance between access and academic rigor
• Recent Data & Case Studies A Snapshot of Declining Admission Standards:

The current admission cycle in India offers clear case studies that highlight the shifting dynamics in the country’s higher education landscape. Two significant processes JoSAA counselling for engineering admissions and CUET-PG-based admissions in central universities exemplify these concerns.

A. JoSAA Counselling 2025 – Unprecedented Lows in JEE Ranks

• - According to second-round seat allocation data from JoSAA (Joint Seat Allocation Authority), candidates with remarkably low All India Ranks (AIRs) have secured admissions in National Institutes of Technology (NITs):
• - A male candidate with AIR 13,14,967 was allotted Mechanical Engineering at NIT Mizoram under the open category (home state quota).
• - A female candidate with AIR 12,10,797 was admitted to Mathematics and Computing at the same institution through female supernumerary quota.
• This trend indicates that vacant seats in newer or less sought-after NITs are being filled with minimal academic screening, threatening the credibility of the “merit-based” engineering entrance ecosystem.

B. CUET-PG 2025 – Negative Marks and Zero Cut-offs at DU

• - In Delhi University’s PG admission (Round 1) through CUET-PG, the minimum allocation scores are startling:
• - MA Buddhist Studies (UR): -10 marks
• - MA Arabic (UR): -5 marks
• - MSc Chemistry, Hansraj College (SC): -3 marks
• - MA Russian (UR): 0 marks

These figures suggest that even candidates scoring negative or zero marks are being granted entry into postgraduate programs in one of India’s most prestigious universities.

C. Decline Across Disciplines

This is not isolated to one department or stream. Subjects like Philosophy, Linguistics, and even core sciences have reported historically low thresholds. Experts worry that this could lead to a sharp decline in research output, peer competition, and classroom standards. 

Causes Behind the Decline in Admission Standards:

The deteriorating admission benchmarks in India’s higher education system stem from a complex interplay of structural, policy, and demographic factors. Some of the key causes include:

A. Exponential Rise in Number of Seats Without Matching Demand

• - Over the past decade, there has been a massive expansion in the number of institutions, particularly in the form of new IITs, NITs, and Central Universities. However, the demand-to-seat ratio has not kept pace. Many institutions especially in remote regions struggle to attract enough applicants, leading to vacant seats being filled at any cost.

B. Overreliance on Centralized Entrance Exams

• - CUET and JEE, while introduced to standardize admission, have resulted in one-size-fits-all systems that sometimes fail to assess true academic potential—especially in humanities and social sciences. The normalization process used in CUET-PG has particularly led to illogical score interpretations, such as negative marks receiving admission offers, thus undermining meritocracy.

C. Quota Expansion Without Infrastructure Support

• - Inclusion through reserved categories, home state quotas, and gender-based supernumerary seats is necessary for equity. However, when these reservations are implemented without proportional infrastructure (faculty, labs, hostel facilities), it risks compromising the learning environment for all.

D. Lack of Awareness and Counselling Among Aspirants

• - Thousands of seats go unfilled not because of lack of talent, but due to poor dissemination of information, especially in rural or underprivileged areas. Talented students miss deadlines or fail to apply due to lack of guidance, while low-performing students with better access fill those seats.

E. Institutional Pressure to Avoid Vacant Seats

• - There is growing pressure on universities and institutes to maintain full occupancy for financial viability and public perception. This pushes them to lower entry standards drastically during later admission rounds, often admitting students who are underprepared for rigorous academic environments.

Consequences on the Academic Ecosystem:

The lowering of admission standards in reputed institutions has far-reaching consequences not just for individual universities but for the entire higher education ecosystem of India. These include:

A. Dilution of Academic Quality and Rigor

• - When students with inadequate foundational knowledge are admitted, universities are often compelled to lower the academic rigor of their programs. This affects the pace and depth of teaching, impacting both strong and weak students. Over time, it leads to a decline in research output, innovation, and global rankings.

B. Demotivation of High-Achieving Students

• - High-performing students who gain admission on merit often feel discouraged when they see peers with much lower scores receiving the same opportunities. This erodes trust in the system, reduces academic competitiveness, and may even lead to brain drain, as many opt for foreign institutions.

C. Faculty Burnout and Frustration

• - Professors are tasked with bridging large skill gaps within classrooms. Repeatedly adjusting teaching methods and slowing down course delivery leads to burnout. Moreover, faculty research suffers when significant time is diverted to remedial teaching.

D. Reputation Damage to Indian Universities

• - India’s top universities like Delhi University, JNU, AMU, and BHU are increasingly viewed with skepticism globally when headlines show admissions at zero or negative scores. This has a direct impact on international collaborations, student exchange programs, and research funding.

E. Long-Term Workforce Challenges

• - Students entering with weak academic grounding often graduate with limited practical skills. This affects their employability and leads to underemployment, reducing the return on investment for both the individual and the nation. Moreover, if such students pursue teaching or research, it perpetuates a cycle of mediocrity.

The Bigger Question – Are We Compromising the Future of Indian Research and Innovation?

At the heart of this crisis lies a fundamental concern: Are we preparing the next generation of researchers, educators, and thought leaders with the academic depth and integrity required to lead India into a knowledge-driven future?

A. Future Researchers with Weak Foundations

• - When postgraduate admissions include candidates with zero or negative scores, many of these individuals may later enter academia, research institutions, or civil services. Their lack of academic preparation undermines the quality of higher-level research, thesis writing, and policymaking sectors critical to national progress.

B. Undermining National Educational Goals

• - India aspires to be a global knowledge hub, with initiatives like NEP 2020, GIAN, and Study in India. But this goal is threatened when admission policies prioritize quantity over quality. Without a strong academic backbone, these policies contradict the ambition of creating world-class institutions.

C. Global Comparisons and Reputational Risk

• - In contrast, top global universities maintain stringent admission standards, ensuring consistent academic output. When Indian central universities admit students with negative CUET scores, it damages the credibility of our degrees internationally and limits the mobility of Indian students across global academia and job markets.

D. Policy vs. Practice

• - While inclusion and representation are important goals, lack of transparent academic benchmarking, unchecked cutoffs, and systemic loopholes create long-term harm. The country must ask: Are we building an education system based on empowerment or mere enrolment?
• *Balancing Equity with Excellence – The Way Forward:* 
• While access to education is a fundamental right and inclusivity is a cornerstone of democratic societies, it must not come at the cost of academic integrity and institutional excellence. India needs a balanced and thoughtful approach that upholds both equity and merit.

A. Reform the Admission Criteria

• - Rather than admitting students with zero or negative scores, universities could:
• - Set a reasonable minimum qualifying threshold (even if low), ensuring basic academic preparedness.
• - Provide bridge courses or foundation programs for marginalized students to help them catch up academically before entering rigorous postgraduate programs.

B. Focus on Quality Support Systems

• - Instead of lowering standards, the government and universities should invest in:
• - Remedial classes
• - Mentorship programs
• - Peer learning models These interventions will help students from disadvantaged backgrounds succeed without compromising standards.

C. Improve Transparency in Cutoffs and Allocation

• - Universities and testing bodies must: Clearly publish and explain cutoffs, especially when they fall below expected academic norms.
• - Engage in public consultations and feedback to restore faith in the system and ensure accountability.

D. Strengthen School and Undergraduate Education

• - If students are scoring poorly in CUET, it reflects not just on the test, but also on the foundation of their prior education. This calls for major investment in: Government school infrastructure, Teacher training programs, Curriculum reform and skill development at the school level

E. National Dialogue on Academic Standards

A wider conversation involving:

• - Academicians,
• - Policymakers,
• - Students, and
• - Civil society

Conclusion:

India stands at a critical crossroads in shaping the future of its higher education landscape. While democratizing access through national-level entrance exams like CUET is a commendable step, the recent trends such as zero and negative cutoff scores in prestigious central universities pose serious questions about the credibility, competitiveness, and global standing of our institutions.

Universities are not just centers of learning; they are incubators of future researchers, thinkers, policymakers, and leaders. Admitting students without ensuring minimum academic preparedness undermines the very purpose of higher education. It risks diluting not only the quality of learning and research but also the confidence of faculty, employers, and the international academic community. To preserve both inclusivity and excellence, it is imperative that India reforms its admission framework, strengthens its public schooling system, and equips underprivileged students with support mechanisms that enable success without compromising standards.

The challenge is great, but so is the opportunity. With the right policies and collective will, India can build an education system that is equitable, rigorous, and globally respected one that truly empowers its youth and secures the nation's intellectual future.

List of References:

 Ministry of Education (MoE), Government of India - Annual Reports & Statistics- https://www.education.gov.in

*National Testing Agency (NTA) – CUET-UG/PG Reports* - https://cuet.samarth.ac.in - https://nta.ac.in

*University Grants Commission (UGC) – Guidelines and Policy Documents* - https://www.ugc.gov.in 

*JoSAA Counselling Data 2024-25 (IITs/NITs Admissions)*-- https://josaa.nic.in

*QS World University Rankings 2025* -- https://www.topuniversities.com

*US News & World Report – Best Global Universities 2025*  - https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities

*Academic Insights from Professors at University of Delhi (Public Statements)* - Extracted from verified press reports and interviews (via The Wire, Indian Express, The Hindu)

*The Hindu / Times of India / Indian Express – News Articles on University Cut-offs*- https://www.thehindu.com -- https://www.indianexpress.com

*NIRF (National Institutional Ranking Framework) India Rankings 2024* -- https://www.nirfindia.org

*Parliamentary Committee Reports on School & Higher Education (Rajya Sabha & Lok Sabha)* - Available via PRS Legislative Research: https://prsindia.org